Ministry
for Development of North Eastern Region
"When
we see that the Central Ministry to spend 10% of their gross budgetary
support in the North-East, it reflects that there is no neglect. In fact,
it amounts to affirmative positive action." - Mani Shankar
Aiyar, Minister
CMs
SPEAK
"The
NDC, the apex national planning body of the country, has to foster consensus
building amidst diverse and varying perspectives to minimize these imbalances
in a time bound manner" -Gegong
Apang, Arunchal
Pradesh
"A
modified NEIP should be formulated exclusively for the North Eastern states
so that the benefit of the policy can be reaped by the states of this
region during Eleventh Plan." -
Tarun Gogoi, Assam
"During
the five year period of Eleventh Plan, administration and physical infrastructure
needs to be strengthened to enable the North Eastern States to respond
appropriately to the liberalized polic."
- O. Ibobi Singh,Manipur
"The
idea of an economic zone for the North East Region may perhaps be a good
idea, if sound economic policies, strategies & activities can be ensured
in an integrated manner."
- D.D. Lapang, Meghalaya
"It
is necessary to have flexible norms and guidelines for implementation
of the various Central schemes in order to cater to the peculiar requirements
of the hilly States which still require special attention."
- Zoramthanga, Mizoram
"The
northeast region could become an effective cultural and economic bridge
between India and South East Asia. To achieve this objective infrastructure
development must be stepped up." - Neiphiu
Rio,Nagaland
"The
Governments of North East have been, yet again have been advised to go
for open marketing borrowing. As we are all aware, the financial position
of the North eastern States is not healthy and the loan indebtedness is
putting us on the road of debt trap. As such I would urge a reconsideration
of this issue at the highest quarters".
- Pawan Chamling, Sikkim
“The
growing feeling of discontent and frustration and a sense of injustice
is attributed to regional imbalance. We must make all efforts to dispel
such negative and disruptive feelings, which can also drive the people,
particularly a section of young and unemployed, to the path of extremism
and other anti-national activities.”
- Manik Sarkar, Tripura
North
East Council (NEC)
|
NORTH
EAST
Neglect no more;
winds of change blowing
On
a national scale, North East had long been virtually out of focus barring usual
financial supports from the federal government for variety
of reasons. It has been the North East Council which had been trying to
do its bit within the limited capacity. The states on their turn tried
what they can do within their extremely
limited financial powers. The result has been quite worrisome. The sectoral performance
of the region is far below the national average. While the GDP of the
country as a whole is growing at 9.2% per annum, the growth rate in the
North-East as a whole is under 4%. Nearly 98% of the frontiers of the
North-East constitute the international frontier of India and the remaining
2% is connected with the rest of the country. Still North-East has virtually
no trade relationship with those bordering countries. The region’s trade
with other states is not worth mentioning either. A sense of ‘alienation
and neglect’ had brewed over decades. The regional stability has been
threatened by occasional insurgencies in some of the states.
 |
But
in last two-three years things have started changing for better. The federal
minister for Development of North Eastern Region (DoNER), Mani
Shankar Aiyar also sounds quite optimistic and very positive
and forward-looking about the changing scenario. "For the last
five or six years we had a policy in India, which says, that 10%
of the gross budgetary support of almost all Central Ministry has
to spend in the North-East. When we
consider of the total surface |
area of the North East, it is around
4% of India and their population is 8%. When we see that the Central
Ministry to spend 10% of their gross budgetary support in the North-East,
it reflects that there is no neglect. In fact, it amounts to affirmative
positive action," he asserted. The government is planning massive
investments in different sectors in the North-East in the 11th
Plan. The most important task now is to create absorbing capacity
of the region of such massive investments. |
The
Prime Minister Manmohan Singh has called upon the state governments in north
eastern region to become more active in creating an environment conducive
to investment. What the North-Eastern Chief Ministers have to say? They
have opened up their minds at the 52nd National Development
Council meeting presided over by the Prime Minister that dealt with in
details the 11th Plan approach paper issues for the North-East
region.
 |
“To
tackle the problem of regional disparities and backwardness, the
focus during 11th
plan should be on
recognition of backwardness of individual States as the main factor
to be taken into account in the transfer of financial resources
from the Centre to the States, encouragement of investment in backward
States both through mobilizing more internal resources as well as
ensuring a much larger flow of resources from outside through
different mechanisms, said |
different mechanisms, Gegong Apang, the Chief Minister
of Arunachal Pradesh, area-wise largest state in the
north eastern region. "The issue of orientation of working
of the financial institutions has to be addressed to be effectively
in favour of poorer States. Further, dovetailing of public sector
projects with regional development plans by consciously developing
regional linkages and implementation of special area specific development
programmes would reduce the existing regional imbalances. The
National Development Council,
the apex national planning body of the country, has to foster consensus
building amidst diverse and varying perspectives to minimize these
imbalances in a time bound manner”, he said The State is lagging
far behind in terms of development indicators in comparison to even
other NE States. From the point of view of social indicators also,
there exists among the N.E States a wide variation, Apang pointed
out. |
 |
The
Assam
Chief Minister Tarun Gogoi voiced concern over “dilution” of
the North East Industrial
Policy (NEIP). The
1997 policy got diluted and become less attractive for the North
Eastern states due to its extension to other states like Uttaranchal,
Himachal Pradesh and Jammu & Kashmir, he pointed out at the
NDC meet and said these three non-NE states have already attracted
industrial investment of more than Rs.
17000
crore in nearly three years time as against Rs.
1300 crore only |
by
entire NE region during last nine years. “I therefore, strongly
urge that various provision of NEIP should carefully be reviewed
and a modified NEIP should be formulated exclusively for the North
Eastern states so that the benefit of the policy can be reaped by
the states of this region during Eleventh Plan,” he said. |
While
urging that the existing NEC scheme for promotion of small-scale industries
in the state should be continued during the 11th Plan. The
Assam CM
advocated for Special
Economic Zones (SEZ) to
promote such industries “even if it is not be as large as provided for
in the rules at present”. Keeping in view the locational disadvantage
of the state and the entire North Eastern Region, “the stipulated norms
for the SEZ may
be modified suitably and funded fully with central support till any private
party is willing to invest,” he said.
About
sharing of surplus power being generated by the mega projects in NE region
the Assam CM seeks first priority be given to the deficit
states of the region for growth of industry there before its being evacuated
to other states. “For this purpose policy intervention, if required, should
be made on priority basis,” he added.
Mr.
Gogoi
has sought the Planning Commission’s financial and technical support in
the field of Information Technology. "IT has enough potential for employment
and income generation. To exploit this potential, necessary training and
backup support will be required in the form of venture capital so that
the youths can avail the benefit of IT revolution. I trust that the Planning
Commission would provide required financial and technical support to the
state in this area.”
Thai Business delegation's visit
A
high power 35-member Thai Business Delegation led by Krirk-krai
Jirapaet, Minister of Commerce, Thailand, visited NEC Secretariat
on June 24, 2007 and held meeting with Indian representatives under
the chairmanship of Mani Shankar Aiyar, India's federal minister
for Development of North Eastern Region who is also chairman
of the North East Council. The Thai delegation's visit opened up
a new horizon towards strengthening the bond of friendship between
India and Thailand.
It
is significant to note that the
Ministry of DONER and NEC under the leadership of Aiyar have undertaken
a number of initiatives for the development and progress of the
entire North Eastern Region. While many schemes/projects have since
been implemented, a lot more are yet in the pipeline. The promotion
of Trade and Commerce in the region with the participation and cooperation
of the neighboring countries is one of the thrust areas in the agenda
drawn up for the development of the NER as envisaged by the Ministry
of DONER and NEC.
The
Thai Delegation held Interactive Sessions on Rubber, Bamboo, Handloom,
Handicrafts etc. They had sector wise interactive sessions between
officials and business people on Power, Road, Inland waterways and
Silk Development with different state governments and the North
east Council as well.
As a follow-up initiative by the ministry of
Development of North Eastern region, a 'North-East India Trade
& Investment Opportunities Week’ was organized in Bangkok from 1-4
October, 2007 to show-case the north eastern region's
potential and to attract investments. The primary reason for taking this initiative was to attract investment
from Thailand in various sectors in the region. The main sectors
which have been identified for this purpose include infrastructure
(road, rail, inland waterways, air connectivity and energy), food
processing, tourism & hospitality, horticulture, handlooms &
handicrafts, rubber and bamboo. These sectors are not exclusive
and businessmen interested in tie- ups in information technology,
private airlines and any other areas have been also invited to participate.
The
federal Minister for Development of Northeast Region (DoNER)
led a 70-member delegation. Dr Ashwani Kumar, Minister of State
for Industry and the Chief Ministers of most of the North Eastern
States also featured in the delegation. Besides, officials from
the Central Ministries like Ministry of Commerce & Industry,
Ministry of Civil Aviation, Ministry of Tourism, Ministry of Shipping,
Road Transport & Highways, etc., all the North East States,
specific Central Organisations/Public Sector Undertakings like National
Highway Authority of India (NHAI), Inland Waterways Authority of
India (IWAI), National Hydroelectric Power Corporation (NHPC), Power
Grid Corporation of Indian Ltd. (PGCIL), North Eastern Electric
Power Corporation ltd. (NEEPCO), Air India, Agricultural and Processed
Food Products Export Development Authority (APEDA), Rubber Board,
Spices Board etc. were also in the delegation. More than 150 businessmen/companies
participated apart from representatives from chambers of commerce
including Indian Chamber of Commerce (ICC), Federation of Industries
& Commerce of North Eastern Region (FINER) and SHEFXIL (Shellac
& Forest Products Export Promotion Council). The Thai Commerce
Minister Krik-Krai Jirapaetand Piyabutr Cholvijarn, Deputy
Industry Minister along with more than 200 Thai businessmen also participated in the various sessions with senior officials from
the Ministries concerned.
|
 |
The
Manipur Chief Minister O. Ibobi Singh maintains that the
federal government’s liberalized economic policy so far could not
bring any positive results for the region. “The relatively backward
North Eastern States including Manipur have not benefited under
the Central Government’s liberalized policies. During the five year
period of Eleventh Plan, administration and physical infrastructure
needs to be strengthened to enable the |
North
Eastern States to respond appropriately to the liberalized policy.
Central Government needs to evolve suitable mechanisms for directing
investments into the less developed North Eastern States,” he told
the NDC. |
Pointing
out that the north east is “a sub optimal option” to an investor, the
CM attributeed this to locational disadvantage and highly unfavourable
terrain impose high transportation cost which cannot be effectively offset
through the usual package of economic incentives. The situation has been
aggravated further by the problem of extremist activities. “ The factors
impeding the integration of the Region’s economy with the domestic and
foreign market far outweigh the integrating forces of liberalization and
an open market economy. In this backdrop, development of intra NE trade
assumes significance”, said Singh.
 |
Dr.
Donkuparroy, the Deputy Chief Minister of Meghalaya,
the state which is totally dependent on road transport except limited
small aircraft flights between its capital Shillong and Kolkata,
said that a “major problem faced not only by Meghalaya but also
by other North eastern States is limited capacity for speedy and
quality construction, with delays in road construction. It would
be better if some important roads are
taken up for construction by a central organization with the |
help of qualified contractors and machinery so that road infrastructure
can be improved quickly. A legislative framework to expedite acquisition
of land other concomitant activities to facilitate infrastructure
creation also seems to be necessary”. |
Donkuparroy
raised a burning issue of trade with Bangladesh. About 22 per cent of
the land area and 23 per cent of its population leave in border areas
of the state. The formal export to Bangladesh from Meghalaya (almost the
entire export from the border blocks) is around Rs 200 crore but import
from Bangladesh is very little. “ A complete policy framework is required
to increase formal trade with Bangladesh including sizeable import at
least to our state.” The
quantity of informal exports is not known but it is guessed it could twice
or may be even thrice the formal export. Expressing serious concern over
fencing being erected all along the Indo-Bangladesh border (so far Meghalaya
is concerned) Donkuparroy said that such an action is likely to
dry up informal trade “totally”. He also apprehends that even export through
formal channels nosedive.”…we anticipate a severe economic crisis in the
border villages when the fencing is fully in place. A special livelihoods,
infrastructure and security based engagement of border villages is urgently
required to be put in place”, the Dy CM emphasized.
 |
Referring
to the role of country’s developmental planning in achieving balanced
regional growth and development the Mizoram Chief Minister Zoramthanga
said that “while implementation of the objectives and strategies
of the 11th Plan will improve the national economy, we
should also not forget that the same can bring about inter-State
inequality leading to more pronounced regional imbalance thereby
jeopardizing existing
national economy. It is, therefore, necessary
to have |
flexible norms and guidelines for implementation of the various
Central schemes in order to cater to the peculiar requirements of
the hilly States which still require special attention.” Zoramthanga however expressed satisfaction about the
emphasis the 11th Plan approach paper has given on infrastructure
in the region. |
 |
Stating
that the northeast region could become an effective cultural and
economic bridge between India and South East Asia, the Nagaland
Chief Minister Neiphiu Rio said
that to achieve this objective “infrastructure development must
be stepped up”. He made a special reference to construction of a
highway along the Indo-Myanmar border, which will “not only open
up the area for trade and economic development, but will also serve
as the |
highway
for patrolling international
border, and for checking of illegal trafficking of drugs and arms
through the famous Golden Triangle. Large sums have been invested
in constructing roads and fencing along the Indo-Bangladesh border;
but surprisingly, no tangible investments has been made along the
strategic Indo-Myanmar border, which is equally important.”
The Nagaland CM urged to the federal government to work out
special incentives to attract investments in the region, which should
be different from, and more attractive as compared to the incentives
available to other special category States in more advantageous
locations in the mainland. |
 |
Urging
the federal government to reconsider the directive regarding the
state share under CSS, the Sikkim Chief Minister Pawan Chamling
said that the north eastern states are finding it difficult to provide
the state share under CSS from their “meager budgetary resources”.
The North Eastern Council members at its 52nd meeting
also expressed similar concern about the resource constraints of
the states. “However, the Governments
of North East have been, yet
again have been |
advised to go for open marketing borrowing. As we are all aware,
the financial position of the North eastern States is not healthy
and the loan indebtedness is putting us on the road of debt trap.
As such I would urge a reconsideration of this issue at the highest
quarters”. |
 |
Observing
that
the north-east region in particular has been been a victim of “misdirected
policies and planning” of the federal government the Tripura
Chief Minister Manik Sarkar said
that “this region is now particularly backward in both physical
and social infrastructure”. He attributed this “growing feeling
of discontent and frustration and a sense of injustice” to this
imbalance. “We must make all efforts to dispel such |
negative
and disruptive feelings,
which can also drive the people, particularly a section of young
and unemployed, to the path of extremism and other anti-national
activities,” the CM pointed out. |
Urging
the federal government for new industrial policy for the region (as the
1997 policy has already expired) Sarkar
suggested that the benefits which would
be available under new NEIP (North East Industrial Policy) “should not
be extended to other parts of the country, which can have their own special
packages, as such extension only dilutes the benefits and rather discourages
industry from coming to this region.” Referring to the “Look East” policy
the Tripura CM observed that the region
has natural and location advantage with NE States having international
boundaries with as many as five South East countries. “We should exploit
this plus factor and due emphasis should be given in the 11th
Plan to develop facilities and the where withal to promote international
trade to and from this region,” he added.
But
the single most inhibiting factor, as has been stated in the Gangtok
declaration, is "the perception of NER as being ridden with
insurgency, militancy and terrorrism. this perception is so much at
variance with ground realities that projecting a true and nuanced picture
of the vast swathes in NER of total peace and tranquility, impeccable law
and order, and iron-clad security for the tourist is as essential for the
development and promotion of tourism in NER as for investment in other
sectors."
DoNER
North East Council
Arunchal
Pradesh
Assam
Manipur
Meghalaya Mizoram
Nagaland
Sikkim
Tripura
PREVIOUS
:
The Sleeping Giant waking up
October 6, 2007
|